Brief
Buy a newspaper with a supplement and go through cutting out any article that contains an illustration. Notice the heading for each article and read the text that the illustration refers to. Make a mental note about the way the illustration relates to the text, how its ideas relate to the meaning of the piece, how it extends the content of the piece.
Analyse the type of illustration – is it decorative, conceptual, informational? Does it use metaphor to convey an idea or does it have a narrative base? Is it representational, abstract or diagrammatic?
Now imagine that you’ve have been commissioned by the paper to create an illustration. Your task is to provide a visual interpretation of one of the headings below:
How green is your food? The best restaurant in town. Loves me, loves me not! Throwing your money away
The object of my desire Finding your family history An interview with Melvin Bragg Paris, still the best place on earth
You may find it useful either to find some text that suits the heading or write a few sentences yourself. Your interpretation can be as personal or as open as you like. For example, you may decide to go and draw an object or place or situation – or your might decide to create your image in a more interpretive or conceptual way.
If you’re confronted with several hundred words of text to illustrate you may find it hard to identify key areas of focus. Approach the task in a series of stages. Start by reading the article all the way through to get a sense of its entire meaning. Try not to think about your visual interpretation at this point. You might find it useful to sum up the article in a short series of sentences.
Next, go through the article with a highlighter pen and identify sentences and words which you consider to be important aspects of the text. Be conscious of connections between these words and the way in which one aspect of the text relates to another. If you’ve been given a heading by an editor, that might point you in the direction of the aspects that you’ll need to respond to in your illustration. Finally, read the text again with a sheet of paper to hand and sketch down ideas as you read through the article. Don’t draw self-consciously. Enjoy the process of visual brainstorming and be open to whatever results from it.
Keywords:
- Buy a newspaper and cut out any article that contains an illustration
- Notice the heading for each article and read the text that the illustration refers to
- Analyse the type of illustration
- Provide a visual interpretation from the list of the article headlines
- Find some text that suits heading
- Your interpretation can be as personal or as open as your like
- Identify sentences and words which you consider important
- Sketch down ideas as you read through the article
- Don’t draw self consciously
- Make a list of words that describe the illustration you want to create
- Identify what the function of your image will be
- Be thorough within your processes of ideas generation
- Create a line visual
- Identify a palette and medium
- Explore several colour variations
- Translate your visual into artwork
- Note down the types of editorial illustration you related to most positively
- The early ideas you considered
- The process by which you decided what aspects of the text you wanted to focus on
Pinterest board – editorial illustration
Analysing the illustration




Visual interpretation
My chosen headline was Loves me, loves me not. I found an article about it:
Guest Column: Loves Me, Loves Me Not (Do the Math)
BY STEVEN STROGATZ MAY 26, 2009 10:00 PMMay 26, 2009 10:00 pm
BY STEVEN STROGATZ

“In the spring,” wrote Tennyson, “a young man’s fancy lightly turns to thoughts of love.” And so in keeping with the spirit of the season, this week’s column looks at love affairs — mathematically. The analysis is offered tongue in cheek, but it does touch on a serious point: that the laws of nature are written as differential equations. It also helps explain why, in the words of another poet, “the course of true love never did run smooth.”
To illustrate the approach, suppose Romeo is in love with Juliet, but in our version of the story, Juliet is a fickle lover. The more Romeo loves her, the more she wants to run away and hide. But when he takes the hint and backs off, she begins to find him strangely attractive. He, on the other hand, tends to echo her: he warms up when she loves him and cools down when she hates him.
What happens to our star-crossed lovers? How does their love ebb and flow over time? That’s where the math comes in. By writing equations that summarize how Romeo and Juliet respond to each other’s affections and then solving those equations with calculus, we can predict the course of their affair. The resulting forecast for this couple is, tragically, a never-ending cycle of love and hate. At least they manage to achieve simultaneous love a quarter of the time.
The model can be made more realistic in various ways. For instance, Romeo might react to his own feelings as well as to Juliet’s. He might be the type of guy who is so worried about throwing himself at her that he slows himself down as his love for her grows. Or he might be the other type, one who loves feeling in love so much that he loves her all the more for it.
Add to those possibilities the two ways Romeo could react to Juliet’s affections — either increasing or decreasing his own — and you see that there are four personality types, each corresponding to a different romantic style.
My students and those in Peter Christopher’s class at Worcester Polytechnic Institute have suggested such descriptive names as Hermit and Malevolent Misanthrope for the particular kind of Romeo who damps out his own love and also recoils from Juliet’s. Whereas the sort of Romeo who gets pumped by his own ardor but turned off by Juliet’s has been called a Narcissistic Nerd, Better Latent Than Never, and a Flirting Fink. (Feel free to post your own suggested names for these two types and the other two possibilities.)
Although these examples are whimsical, the equations that arise in them are of the far-reaching kind known as differential equations. They represent the most powerful tool humanity has ever created for making sense of the material world. Sir Isaac Newton used them to solve the ancient mystery of planetary motion. In so doing, he unified the heavens and the earth, showing that the same laws of motion applied to both.
In the 300 years since Newton, mankind has come to realize that the laws of physics are always expressed in the language of differential equations. This is true for the equations governing the flow of heat, air and water; for the laws of electricity and magnetism; even for the unfamiliar and often counterintuitive atomic realm where quantum mechanics reigns.
In all cases, the business of theoretical physics boils down to finding the right differential equations and solving them. When Newton discovered this key to the secrets of the universe, he felt it was so precious that he published it only as an anagram in Latin. Loosely translated, it reads: “It is useful to solve differential equations.”
The silly idea that love affairs might progress in a similar way occurred to me when I was in love for the first time, trying to understand my girlfriend’s baffling behavior. It was a summer romance at the end of my sophomore year in college. I was a lot like the first Romeo above, and she was even more like the first Juliet. The cycling of our relationship was driving me crazy until I realized that we were both acting mechanically, following simple rules of push and pull. But by the end of the summer my equations started to break down, and I was even more mystified than ever. As it turned out, the explanation was simple. There was an important variable that I’d left out of the equations — her old boyfriend wanted her back.
In mathematics we call this a three-body problem. It’s notoriously intractable, especially in the astronomical context where it first arose. After Newton solved the differential equations for the two-body problem (thus explaining why the planets move in elliptical orbits around the sun), he turned his attention to the three-body problem for the sun, earth and moon. He couldn’t solve it, and neither could anyone else. It later turned out that the three-body problem contains the seeds of chaos, rendering its behavior unpredictable in the long run.
Newton knew nothing about chaotic dynamics, but he did tell his friend Edmund Halley that the three-body problem had “made his head ache, and kept him awake so often, that he would think of it no more.”
I’m with you there, Sir Isaac.
Pinterest board – loves me loves me not
Thumbnails
Based on the concept which was love, I made couple of thumbnails. Some are more iconic related to the title “loves me, loves me not” and some are less iconic.

Line visual

Design process


Final design

Self – reflection
The analysis of the ‘Sunday times’ was very challenging, as for some examples, I couldn’t see the relation from the first instance. I had to read the whole article to be able to find the connection. The heavy use of illustration in the newspaper, shows the importance of the editorial illustrations.
For my title “loves me loves me not”, it was hard to think out of the box as there are some iconic images related to the concept. I wanted to make something that is still related but not exactly the same as the existence examples.
I used leaves and green colour for my design. I made my design in Procreate with watercolour brushes and texture. Added the hand written notes on the leaves.
Sources
The New York Times archive. Loves me loves me not. At: https://archive.nytimes.com/opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/05/26/guest-column-loves-me-loves-me-not-do-the-math/. (Accessed: 20/03/2024)











































































